[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#586243: education-desktop-sugar: please remove this package, it's outdated and confuses users



In Lenny I could have multiple sessions of Sugar with rdesktop but had to install all Sugar packages and the presentation of Lenny changed to Debian Edu. In Squeeze it changed too but I never could share Sugar with rdesktop. Accessing Sugar from desktop terminals or thinstations is important, please don`t forget it while removing packages.




----- Original Message ----- From: "Sascha Silbe" <sascha-debian-bugs-education-desktop-sugar-2010-06-17@silbe.org>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 12:46 PM
Subject: Bug#586243: education-desktop-sugar: please remove this package, it's outdated and confuses users


Package: education-desktop-sugar
Severity: important


Please remove education-desktop-sugar from sid/squeeze. It depends on
obsolete package names and confuses users.
The description suggests this is what to install to get a complete Sugar
installation on a desktop, whereas it will actually install the Debian
Edu suite (+ Sugar). One user even reported it "will hose your boot" (the
system hung part-way through the boot process - unfortunately no more
details are available as he was in a hurry and overwrote the installation
with Fedora afterwards in order to get a working Sugar installation).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
 APT prefers testing
 APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.31.6-xo1.5-2-00364-g7317f88 (PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-edu-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: [🔎] 20100617154629.1829.14409.reportbug@xo15-sascha.sascha.silbe.org">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20100617154629.1829.14409.reportbug@xo15-sascha.sascha.silbe.org





Reply to: