On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 08:28:11PM +0100, RalfGesellensetter wrote:
while staying in the same thread, I changed the subject.
Ah, good pint - I missed that relevant detail.
Am Mittwoch, 16. Dezember 2009 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:Do I misunderstand the scenario or are you deliberate shuffling between multiple scenarios because you seek a one-size-fits-all solution?Not neccessarily - it's rather related to the same use case (disallow users to login under certain circumstances).
Perhaps if you elaborate on the use case: I do not understand how you find PAM relevant for a case of (as I understand it) guest users on a separate subnet.
- Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature