Re: DHCP & IP ranges (10.0.2.0/22?)
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 07:24:44PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Ralf Gesellensetter]
> > Yes, of course, I got it at once when Petter told us. The 2 in
> > 10.0.2.0 is bit no. 10 (from the right), so it changes its
> > meaning. This implies, that it would make sense to move gateway to
> > 10.0.0.1 and tjener to 10.0.0.2 -- otherwise we have a bifid IP
> > range.
>
> IF we are going to move, I would suggest moving away from 10.0.0.0,
> and to some higher number like 10.9.8.0/22, to make it easier to
> extend to /21 and bigger subnets without wanting to move the gateway
> address.
>
> I do not have complete list of the config files that need to change,
> but at least dhcp, dns and squid would have to change. Probably the
> PXE and LTSP installation config too.
i like the idea of switching away from 10.0.2.* addresses, as this makes it
harder to test in qemu/kvm's default networking layout, which uses some of the
same ip addresses.
on the other hand, changing that so late in the release cycle seems...
troublesome.
live well,
vagrant
Reply to: