Hi Andreas, On Donnerstag, 22. Oktober 2009, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:11:40AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > > What I dont understand is why the education-thin-client package has > > usplash as a depends - can someone explain? task/common is the only place > > usplash is refered to in the debian-edu package. > There is no file tasks/thin-client and the dependencies of this package > are directly mentioned in debian/control.stub. Arg. Thanks for making me see. I dont get why I didn't see this, but so be it. And much less I understand why there are three binary packages, who come directly (and exclusively??) from control.stub, while the rest is autogenerated? > > That's the reason the debian-edu package doesnt migrate to squeeze and I > > would like it to ;-) (see > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/debian-edu.html) > Just fix debian/control.stub accordingly. Doing so now. But do we actually need control.stub except for the source package bits? > As I said previosely: It is not a good idea to keep debian/control in > SVN. We don't do that. regards, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.