Re: Bits from the release team and request for discussion
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hi Ralf,
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 09:49:12PM +0200, RalfGesellensetter wrote:
>Am Sunday 02 August 2009 schrieb Oded Naveh:
>> - Could we skip Lenny? Why?
>> - Can we not skip Lenny? How?
>Now, regarding your questions, my situation (an people like Nigel made
>similair requests) is to answer: yes and no!
Do you suggest that to be the official debian-edu answer?
Or are you elaborating on whether it is technically possible
unofficially to do whacky things with a debian-edu installation?
>Let's try to release Lenny for Workstation + LTSP (etch on Tjener will
>be sufficient for quite a while). Some people might consider to be one
>release ahead using Debian Sid[ux] on workstations, anyway.
...and some people run Fedora.
I believe that it is great that lots of people run Linux. But
specifically regarding debian-edu standpoint on skipping Lenny or not I
find it irrelevant to take into account anyone not running debian-edu.
If I install debian-edu, and "upgrade" (a.k.a. "sidegrade") to some
other distribution like Debian Sid, do you then consider me to still run
Debian-edu?
Is it the official opinion of the Debian-edu project that people running
debian-edu + other APT sources still run debian-edu?
>I've been feeling quite for a while now, that it could be a good idea
>to separate Services (esp. Tjener) from Desktop (esp. Workstations).
I thought that was the case already.
Or do you mean to say that they should have different release schedules,
e.g. to include fancier (but possibly less reliable) GUI applications
while being more conservative with server parts?
>That's my two cent, saysing "Nes" or "Yo".
:-)
Kind regards,
- Jonas
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)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=w3c2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: