Re: should iceweasel really be the default browser?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:43:46AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
>On Dienstag, 26. Mai 2009, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> Perhaps file a bugreport against Iceweasel, then?
>It has already been filed, there is a faq about the issue and the
>firefox developers keep thinking, that teaching ignoring warnings "so
>the damn site 'works'" is a good thing.
Please provide a reference - bugnumber or URL, thanks.
>I think their intentions are well ment, but the result is bad.
If you agree with the intentions, how could you imagine a different
Perhaps posting such opinions at that bugreport rather than (or in
addition to) here. If they are not already there.
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----