Re: should iceweasel really be the default browser?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:35:02AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Dienstag, 26. Mai 2009, Oded Naveh wrote:
>> > While iceweasel "doesnt work" for our main internal site.
>> There's still the certificate issue, which applies to Konqueror too.
>> See bug #1328.
>
>Thats what I ment with "doesnt work". Iceweasels cert warnings are much
>more annoying then konquerors...
Those warnings being more annoying is intentional. It is a security
*improvement* over earlier versions of that browser.
Konquerer not having as annoying warnings is a security *weakness*.
We do care about security, right?
- Jonas
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREDAAYFAkobonwACgkQn7DbMsAkQLiK3ACgozsAp6nWY6AZm3l7D/YirKku
E9MAoIOYjSxxShnzRCVg+kLbCVphQ29V
=FmPR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: