Re: RFC/Discuss: Replace KDE by LXDE on LTSP?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 06:37:22PM +0200, Knut Yrvin wrote:
>On Torsdag 30. april 2009, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> I am baffled that Knut still consider switches a security measure now
>> 6 years later.
>
>Jonas'es ideal take on the world is always exiting, especially when he
>takes things out of context, using a straw man argument. Here is what I
>wrote:
>
>> switching gives you a better starting point preventing
>> package sniffing compared with hubs.
It seems to me that Vagrant quoted you correctly (which I then quoted),
and that above is either paraphrasing or quoting something else than
your earlier mail to this thread.
>Does this sentence says that I'm asking people to disregard use of
>other security measures? No, it does not. It only states a fact.
I only said that you regard the use of switches as _a_ security measure.
Not that you disregard other measures.
>My concern is to prevent an unfortunate assumption: That Skolelinux don't
>work because of a small technical security chance, which may give a huge
>change on old machines
Then make security an option rather than mandatory. Just don't promote
something insecure as secure.
>I'm asking for a little perceptive concerning security, not a circus.
Ah, so I am the clown in Knuts circus :-P
- Jonas
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkn6BG0ACgkQn7DbMsAkQLiAEgCfabcW6oT+3OW8B/o4fQTOA5Yk
KlYAnjlzLKcJnV9CcEQrgi8rIsCEcHkX
=h3A2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: