Re: RFS: gvb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 01:29:26PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Sunday 22 June 2008 13:03, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> >I discussed this issue over yesterday (with my Debian Edu ftpmaster
>> >hat), first with Petter (who uploaded a package with such a copyright),
>> >then with Jörg Jaspert (as Debian ftpmaster). At first I consided this
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> >bug to be RC, but now I agree that, while not perfectly correct, this
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> >is not serious at all.
>>
>> This could give the impression that Jörg and Petter agrees with you on
>> this, but really you only say that discussing with them made you relax
>> your standpoint from RC to normal.
I tried disambiguating. You want to play games intstead - ok.
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 01:34:35PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>Note that I am not conviced that pointing to
>/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL in a licensed using GPL v2+ is a bug,
So it seems what you really want to say is that you agree with Jörg (and
him alone). Did I understand that correctly?
Do you see how your original text was ambigous?
>> I still fail to understand why it is a bug to refer to GPLv3 when the
>> copyright holder permits to redistribute under...
>
>Do you see why it is buggy to depend on python2.5 when a depends on
>python is enough?
Yes. Due to Python policy.
Do you see why picking a different license for a dual-licensed project
is not a bug but at most a wishlist request (when not covered by some
packaging policy)?
- Jonas
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
- Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkheSu0ACgkQn7DbMsAkQLiS/wCfQiuEZsuHoE+ccnOlWS//ReBE
aYQAoJU2zQ9cSAl+f/rOQ65O3i53I5DW
=+VaS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: