Hi,
On Sunday 22 June 2008 13:03, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >I discussed this issue over yesterday (with my Debian Edu ftpmaster
> >hat), first with Petter (who uploaded a package with such a copyright),
> >then with Jörg Jaspert (as Debian ftpmaster). At first I consided this
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >bug to be RC, but now I agree that, while not perfectly correct, this
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >is not serious at all.
>
> This could give the impression that Jörg and Petter agrees with you on
> this, but really you only say that discussing with them made you relax
> your standpoint from RC to normal.
>
> I still fail to understand why it is a bug to refer to GPLv3 when the
> copyright holder permits to redistribute under...
Do you see why it is buggy to depend on python2.5 when a depends on python is
enough?
> Was those discussions with Petter and Jörg made in public somewhere?
No. (Well, with Petter I discussed on #debian-edu..)
regards,
Holger
Attachment:
pgpm99cy4H2mE.pgp
Description: PGP signature