Hi, (just for the list, we have discussed this on IRC already..) On Saturday 22 September 2007 23:29, Andreas Tille wrote: > I guess this cdbs-ish appearance is caused by just using the > same idea to include a Makefile that works for a common set > of Debian packages (which are in this case CDD meta packages). Yes :) > > on a second look I see a normal rules file > > using debhelper... > Yes. It is basically the former debian/rules file from debian-edu > that it is included. Just try a >> diff /usr/share/cdd-dev/rules debian-edu-???/debian/rules Right :) > > So you would first need to upload cdd-dev to our etch and we would need > > to approve it. > I don't mind if you add yourself as Uploader and upload to SkoleLinux > mirror (or even Debian mirror if you think something should be changed). > I'm in very big favour of group maintainance. Me too :) > > I guess I definitly prefer to keep a branch. Probably for etch, so that > > the development in trunk can go on with more ease. > Fine with me. Andreas and me have now agreed on irc, that he will switch the debian-edu package to use cdd-dev, he will work in a branch on it, and when he is done, he'll present the work and then we can copy it to trunk. Probably it's a good idea to create a debian-edu etch branch (after r1 or) once this happens and use the new debian-edu packaging for lenny/sid, but keep etch the way it is. The branch will be available at svn://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-edu/people/tille/debian-edu > >(And as said, I acknowledge > > that I might be completly wrong here. Please prove me wrong.) > Hope I did so. You did. Thanks! :-) regards, Holger
Attachment:
pgp732Kb4kavv.pgp
Description: PGP signature