Hi, On Saturday 01 September 2007 11:09, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > I propose to update the version of libpam-foreground in the stable > repository from 0.2-0.edu.etch.5 to 0.2-0.edu.etch.5 > 0.4-0.0.edu.etch.1. The changes are trivial, and the new package is a > clean backport from unstable while the package in the stable release > is our fork to add a few patches that later went into the upstream > version and in unstable. I don't feel fully qualified to comment on this package (atm?), but there are some things I want to remark: > Here is the diff -wr output between the two versions: > > - * Try harder to correct the rhost test. Patch from Daniel Hess. Is that still in the package or now gone? Ah, this is #431730. Ok. > +libpam-foreground (0.3-0ubuntu1) gutsy; urgency=low > +libpam-foreground (0.3) dapper; urgency=low > +libpam-foreground (0.2) dapper; urgency=low > +libpam-foreground (0.1-1) dapper; urgency=low Aehm ;-) But as the last version has the distribution right, this doesnt matter... :) > - * Add --no-start to the dh_installinit call in rules, to avoid > - cleaning /var/run/console/ on upgrades. I cant see this. Neither in the removed nor added changes :) > - * Explicitly link libpam and libc to make lintian happier. Is that gone? > diff -uwr libpam-foreground-0.2/debian/dirs > libpam-foreground-0.4/debian/dirs --- libpam-foreground-0.2/debian/dirs > 2006-01-23 23:44:43.000000000 +0100 +++ libpam-foreground-0.4/debian/dirs > 2007-07-13 14:55:49.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ > -usr/bin > -usr/sbin > +bin > +lib/security Huh? regards, Holger
Attachment:
pgp1TWJnO6Vnd.pgp
Description: PGP signature