Re: should we ship iceweasel (firefox) on the first cd?

To: debian-edu@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: should we ship iceweasel (firefox) on the first cd?
From: Holger Levsen <debian@layer-acht.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 16:09:58 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 200703051609.59499.debian@layer-acht.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200703030049.16319.kyrvin@trolltech.com>
References: <1172525016.5641.12.camel@localhost> <[🔎] 200703022359.48569.debian@layer-acht.org> <[🔎] 200703030049.16319.kyrvin@trolltech.com>

Hi,

On Saturday 03 March 2007 00:49, Knut Yrvin wrote:
>   http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/79
>   http://cbeard.typepad.com/mozilla/2006/10/mozilla_and_ubu.html

Interesting, but I couldn't figure out what the details of the actual deal 
are.


regards,
	Holger

Attachment: pgpFYcLYjgnEj.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Re: should we ship iceweasel (firefox) on the first cd?
  - From: Holger Levsen <debian@layer-acht.org>
- Re: should we ship iceweasel (firefox) on the first cd?
  - From: Knut Yrvin <kyrvin@trolltech.com>

Prev by Date: Re: should we ship iceweasel (firefox) on the first cd?
Next by Date: Intent to NMU debian-edu-install to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs
Previous by thread: Re: should we ship iceweasel (firefox) on the first cd?
Next by thread: Re: should we ship iceweasel (firefox) on the first cd?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread