[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Minutes for the IRC Meeting 06.02.2006



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 00:21:27 +0100
Steffen Joeris <Steffen.Joeris@skolelinux.de> wrote:

> Release Codename:
> Steffen Joeris (white) asked after the codename and version number
> for the next release.
> Petter Reinholdtsen (pere) decided to give the decision to the
> release manager, so Finn-Arne Johansen (finnarne) will surprise us
> later.

Are we talking about the name of the distribution or just the codename?

I interpreted the raw IRC log differently.


Let me clarify by using Debian as example (not implying that Debian
is perfect or a good role model, just using it as example!):

The project "Debian" develops a system called "Debian GNU/Linux". The
current release is version 3.1. Internally during development it was
named "sarge", and that codename has been promoted also officially as a
nickname.


So is Finn-Arne expected to surprise us with a codename, a distribution
name or ...?

I ask because of the issue raised earlier tonight about possible
problems with the use of "Debian" as part of the distribution name.


 - Jonas

- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFD5+EKn7DbMsAkQLgRAh/BAKCHdYBR2gBAFM3q5TgBq1X4lsDjMwCeN8mX
+4KXs06QThHgkmYTr4Peq/o=
=Sp3o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: