* Morten Werner Olsen <werner@skolelinux.no> [2005-12-27 22:58:55]: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 12:30:28PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > David C. Weichert's proposal: > > > > * www.skolelinux.org (International Portal) > > > * blogs.skolelinux.org (Blogs) > > > * planet.skolelinux.org (Planet) > > > * people.skolelinux.org (Pages about members) > > > * wiki.skolelinux.org (Wiki) > > > * doc.skolelinux.org (Documentation) > > > * bugs.skolelinux.org (Bugtracking) > > > > What about schools.skolelinux.org ? > > My old proposal: > > > o http://skolelinux.org/ -> forwarded to /wiki/ (?) > > o http://skolelinux.org/wiki/ > > o http://skolelinux.org/blogs/ > > o http://skolelinux.org/planet/ > > o http://skolelinux.org/doc/ > > o http://skolelinux.org/schools/ > > o http://bugs.skolelinux.org/ > > o http://people.skolelinux.org/ or http://folk.skolelinux.org/ > > > > So who feels responsible for the organisation of the .org-proposal > > > and who has the control about that? > > > > I still have a hard time understanding the difference between > > skolelinux development and Debian development. I have no interest in > > building up a parallel to Debian. > > > > And no, I do not believe it is necessary that all development is done > > by "authorized personel" (read: official Debian developers). Official > > developers are needed for the final packaging steps of signing and > > uploading (which means they personally take responsibility of the > > quality of the package, so in reality there's more to it than just the > > simple acts). > > This is a more detailed proposal from me where I try to figure out > which parts of the Debian infrastructure we can/should use. > > o http://skolelinux.org/ - I would like to forward this front-page to a > wiki where a lot of our information is present and at least most of > it is linked up. Maybe to one or more SVN-dumps to > http://skolelinux.org/<svn-dump>/ where our documentation-tree from > d.skolelinux.no/documentation/ is a great example. > > Can we use Debian's webpages for this? I don't think so, because we > don't have enough DD's for commiting patches to the webpages, > right? non-dds can do webstuff in debian. i dont see a problem there. > o http://skolelinux.org/wiki/ - our main site where the content is > like described above. The Germans have done a great job with their > wiki, so I believe we should be able to use the same technology for > our international site. But, if this should work out we must agree > that the master language is english. Does anyone have a problem > with that? > > And will the Germans move some of their content (which is of > interest to the international and technical visitors) from their > wiki at skolelinux.de/wiki/ to this wiki? is that important? > Could we use http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu for this? Yes > probably. The only challenge I see is that if we for one reason > would like to do any changes deeper into the wiki, we don't have > permissions to that. I'm not sure if this will be a problem. Can > we have the opinion of you guys administrating the wiki on > http://skolelinux.de/wiki/ ?? Do we have other arguments for not > using wiki.debian.org? what potential problems do you see coming? an own stylesheet for a sub-part of the wiki? (is that possible?) > o http://blogs.skolelinus.org/ - I'm not a blogger nor a blog-admin > myself, so if anyone have any comments that would have been great. > I don't believe Debian have any blogging-infrastructure, so we'll > have to set up our own. > > o http://planet.skolelinux.org/ - Can we use planet.debian.org? Is > there only DD's that are linked up there? And planet.debian.org's > target is probably Developers not users, teachers, and admins, or > am I wrong? > > o http://skolelinux.org/doc/ - I believe this can be a good place do > dump a directory from SVN with our Skolelinux-specific > documentation. That is the documentation that has to do with our > CD, architecture, the sysadmin-documentation and so on. I don't > believe Debian has any place where this fit in? > > o http://skolelinux.org/schools/ - The list of schools that we > already have today. > > o http://bugs.skolelinux.org/ - Can we use bugs.d.o? Yes, for a lot > of bugs we can and we should, but I don't think pointing teachers > to bugs.d.o's interfaces is a good idea. So if we want bugreports > from our primary users, I believe we should continue use the > bugzilla we have at bugs.skolelinux.no now. It has been put a lot > of effort in cleaning it up too. > > o http://people.skolelinux.org/ or http://folk.skolelinux.org/ - > homepages for all that have an skolelinux.org-account. As we not > are only Debian Developers, people.debian.org cannot be used. > > Comments are more than welcome! :) looks good to me.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature