On Tuesday 20 December 2005 12:30, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > I agree (as some of youve probably noticed from my hinting about it > from time to time). The reason I clarify the separate needs is that > Ole-Anders Andreassen has joined this thread and is *explicitly* > interested in the admin community. > > I see a point in Skolelinux providing portal tools for local school > admins to feel part of a greater community. ok. > I still have a hard time understanding the difference between > skolelinux development and Debian development. I have no interest in > building up a parallel to Debian. Who talks about that? You should know that i agree in getting all stuff back into debian, but nevertheless we need space for our own stuff (maybe call it debian-edu.org). We are at a point where we have special stuff for our own. This of course means that we need a kinda policy (where we can write down that we are all Debians and see ourselves as a part of the Debian Project). And I think this also means that we have to work in an .org-team where we can organize important stuff together, because now I see that your fear becomes true. We are still working in local teams and I think there is not a one way development, but i think this is what you and me and many others want to have. We need one development tree (we can together decide how it looks like, means on the do-o-cratic way) and not many small trees ... And for that I think the .org-proposal is the right way. > I suspect most (norwegian at least) Skolelinux developers do not share > my views, so me in charge of this would probably not be representative > of Skolelinux (but hey - we are a do-o-cracy, not a democracy, so who > cares, right?). I care ;) Greetings Steffen
Attachment:
pgpo_U8VpoM09.pgp
Description: PGP signature