Re: bugzilla-skolelinux subscribed?
On Son, 04 Dez 2005, Knut Yrvin wrote:
> > I really don't like this style of "recommendation", because it looks like
> > "this is the only way, to do things right". And yes its an important
> > part, one of many. Are there some other lists for the other parts?
> The list get a message about the un-owned bugs. The reason for this is
> to motivate people to take action, and take ownership to a bug, and
> fix it. If you get annoyed by that, then you can do one of two. You can
> take ownership to a bug and contribute. That's the general idea. Or
> you can live with it.
> Skolelinux is governed by a do-o-cratic way of working: those doing
> the work decide how it is done. Your answer was just as I
> expected. You ask for a vote on this issue, and unfortunately its not
> decided by a "vote". Our motivation to get more attention to bugs by
> posting them at the Skolelinux / debian-edu list is done in a
> do-o-cratic way. I can't see that you have contributed much to get
> Skolelinux up and going, and you don't seem interested to take
> ownership to one or more bugs either.
> If I have something to say about this issue, you have to contribute to
> the work getting Skolelinux bug-fixed to get the bug-annoyance down
> on this list - and that's the general idea.
OK, so you take away the only way to get insight view into the project by
spamming the list and telling the people "eat or die". Not very nice i think.
And trying to change the topic to "you haven't closed any bugs, so i'm right"
isn't helpful either.
But the points where made, and i had made by contribution to the project by
suggesting a new ML, but sadfully it looks like, that the measures are closed
bugs in bugzilla. So i will open a new bug for this thread in buzgilla,
and take the ownership for it to get the contribution more weight.
--
Florian Reitmeir
Reply to: