Re: Why acroread instead of xpdf? (Was: A swim in icewm, and a choice of applications.)

To: debian-edu@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-edu@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why acroread instead of xpdf? (Was: A swim in icewm, and a choice of applications.)
From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:35:26 +0200 (CEST)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.62.0509272233560.27824@wr-linux02>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20050927201005.GB19493@saruman.uio.no>
References: <[🔎] 1127847755.1140.185.camel@static02.intern> <[🔎] 20050927201005.GB19493@saruman.uio.no>

On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:

The replacement package included in debian-edu is xpdf.  Are there
problems with xpdf solved with acroread?


Some nice features of latex-beamer (for instance transparency in images)
are only available with acroread.  I would love to switch to xpdf if
it would as feature complete as acroread is.

Kind regards

          Andreas.

--
http://fam-tille.de

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why acroread instead of xpdf? (Was: A swim in icewm, and a choice of applications.)
  - From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>

References:
- A swim in icewm, and a choice of applications.
  - From: Harald Thingelstad <harald@skolelinux.no>
- Why acroread instead of xpdf? (Was: A swim in icewm, and a choice of applications.)
  - From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>

Prev by Date: Why acroread instead of xpdf? (Was: A swim in icewm, and a choice of applications.)
Next by Date: Re: Why acroread instead of xpdf? (Was: A swim in icewm, and a choice of applications.)
Previous by thread: Why acroread instead of xpdf? (Was: A swim in icewm, and a choice of applications.)
Next by thread: Re: Why acroread instead of xpdf? (Was: A swim in icewm, and a choice of applications.)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread