Bug#276896: marked as done (missing recommands (and other redundant complaints))
Your message dated Sun, 17 Oct 2004 21:58:54 -0400
with message-id <20041018015854.GB5777@kitenet.net>
and subject line Bug#276896: current RC issues in debian-edu
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2004 11:30:34 +0000
>From bunk@stusta.de Sun Oct 17 04:30:34 2004
Return-path: <bunk@stusta.de>
Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de [141.84.69.5]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CJ9FB-00016l-00; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 04:30:34 -0700
Received: (qmail 1277 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2004 11:30:32 -0000
Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144)
by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 17 Oct 2004 11:30:32 -0000
Received: by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 160CCBB58D; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:30:01 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: current RC issues in debian-edu
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:30:01 +0200
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20041017113001.160CCBB58D@r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: debian-edu
Version: 0.802
Severity: serious
Currently, there are at least the following RC issues in debian-edu:
The package downloads Package lists during build time.
It's not acceptable that a package might build differently depending
on whether an online connection is available.
Please use Package files located in the package during the build.
For your convenience, you can always add a seperate Makefile target
to download these files as long as it doesn't happen automatically
during package build.
Unsatisfied Recommends:
- education-common: kudzu (m68k), read-edid (!i386),
dmidecode (!i386, !ia64)
- education-mathematics: kgeo
- education-thin-client-server: ltsp-kernel-2.4.22-i386,
ltsp-x-core-i386,
ltsp-x-xserver-mach64-3.3.6-i386,
ltsp-core-i386,
ltsp-x-xserver-mach32-3.3.6-i386,
ltsp-x-xserver-svga-3.3.6-i386,
ltsp-x-xserver-s3-3.3.6-i386
Unsatisfied Recommends in sarge:
- education-electronics: oregano
- education-main-server: webmin-exports, webmin-squid, webmin-dhcpd,
webmin-bind
- education-mathematics: drgenius
- education-standalone: mozilla-locale-zh-cn, mozilla-locale-gl-es,
mozilla-locale-el, mozilla-locale-zh-tw,
mozilla-locale-es-es, mozilla-locale-cy
- education-standalone-extras: drgenius
- education-thin-client-server: webmin-dhcpd
- education-desktop-other: drgenius
You might argue about the problems only present in sarge (since new
packages flood into sarge every day and your release managers remove
other packages every day). But your policy is explicit about the fact
that a Recommends must be fulfillable, and e.g. recommends on
non-existing packages for the long-gone XFree86 3.3.6 simply sound
silly.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 276896-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Oct 2004 01:57:46 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Sun Oct 17 18:57:46 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CJMmQ-0002Vo-00; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 18:57:46 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C4217F5B;
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 01:57:45 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 616F46E0B8; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 21:58:54 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 21:58:54 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, 276896-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#276896: current RC issues in debian-edu
Message-ID: <20041018015854.GB5777@kitenet.net>
References: <[🔎] 20041017113001.160CCBB58D@r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20041017113001.160CCBB58D@r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: 276896-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Currently, there are at least the following RC issues in debian-edu:
>=20
> The package downloads Package lists during build time.
> It's not acceptable that a package might build differently depending
> on whether an online connection is available.
This has already been discussed with the release managers and was
determined not to be release critical. An open bug already exists: #274745
> Please use Package files located in the package during the build.
> For your convenience, you can always add a seperate Makefile target
> to download these files as long as it doesn't happen automatically
> during package build.
Doing this for all architectures would bloat debian-edu's source to about
30 mb. Better plans exist, post-sarge.
> Unsatisfied Recommends:
Have already been discussed with the release managers and determined not
to be release critical. (In #273734 and associated threads and
discussion).
--=20
see shy jo
--CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBcyNdd8HHehbQuO8RAmg9AJ4p2iNgCP/th4TIN2lZCbaZ0yZB8gCfQaP6
yOJRE26WIeWfJ7+doQGAvuI=
=CeJE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5--
Reply to: