> Your option 128 looks strange, mine are all e4:45:74:68:00:00;, > why is > yours 00:80:C8:6C:57:5B? Is that your mac address? Yes it is a mistake of me. Well at least a misunderstanding. > Also, have you tried Etherboot 5.0.11 > http://rom-o-matic.net/5.0.11/ ? I got it work with 5.0.10. I never realize older version of Etherboot may work better. Ok, everything is fine now. Thanks Hilaire