Re: RFT: samba-ldap
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 10:05:24PM +0200, Markus Schabel wrote:
> Finn-Arne Johansen wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 04:29:40PM +0200, Finn-Arne Johansen wrote:
> >>I have recompiled samba-2.2.3a from debian.security.org with
> >>ldap-support.
> >>I have also created a samba-ldap package to bind the samba-package to
> >>the one compiled with ldap-support.
> [snip]
> >Why do we need an ldap-enabled samba ?
> [snip]
> why don't simply use samba-3? it should solve most of the problems, and
> its release a while ago, and should already be in testing. I really
> think 2.2.3 should not be used anymore, >=2.2.5 is ok (since there is
> a lot of changes in LDAP code there), and IMHO nothing speaks against 3.
Because 2.2.3a is whats in woody, and it's maintained there, and it
works.
Either we use 2.2.3a thats in woody, or we backport the one in
unstable, until the we start to get security patches for the one in
woody.
--
Finn-Arne Johansen
faj@bzz.no
http://bzz.no/
Reply to: