Re: debconf procedures and SMC as a trusted organization
Reply in-line :-
On 18/04/2018, Pirate Praveen <praveen@onenetbeyond.org> wrote:
>
>
<snipped>
> You are comparing Apples to Oranges here. An SPI associate project is
> completely different from a Debian Trusted Organization.
>
right.
> -> Debian and SMC (among many other Free Software projects) both are
> associate projects of SPI.
> -> SPI is one of the many Debian trusted organizations.
>
> May be you are referring to
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-dug-in/2014/11/msg00027.html
>
on the money. That is exactly what I was thinking/remembering excerpts from
when I read the irc log, that a conversation had happened on those
lines, having a non-profit but nothing came from it then.
>
>
We should try to fix this if we want to have a Debconf say even 3-4
years from now.
I dunno if you have been following some of the debconf discussions or
not but it seems
to make whole lot easier if an organization is a trusted organization.
We could also look at ocf.tw both the kind of work they are doing and
recording of it.
I was able to connect with couple of people there and they told me
they are 8 volunteers who run this apart from their various day jobs,
college or whatever they do.
I believe we are substantially more as far as numbers are concerned.
See the project page,
https://ocf.tw/p/ . Even though it in Mandarin, Chinese you can get a
sense of it.
What we seem to lack are documentors of our efforts.
--
Regards,
Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल
My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
Reply to: