[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Fwd: Re: relayb0t



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hey Balasankar,

I don't see the relayb0t any more ?
Is it to assume that the bot has been discontinued ?



On Mon, 2016-09-19 at 18:13 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-09-18 at 01:57 +0530, Balasankar C wrote:
> > One suggestion I have is to make relaybot pass messages ONLY when it is
> > mentioned and not always. I know this makes difficult to know what is
> > happening
> > on the other side (unless the people speaking on the other side explicitly
> > mentions relaybot), but still.
> > 
> 
> 
> But then that won't be what it was intended initially, i.e. a bridge.
> Also, if you are to talk about workarounds, every individual IRC user should
> be
> able to use /ignore on relaybot ?
> 
> > Or, we can try make relaybot do personal messages instead of group messages
> > -
> > a
> > subscription model. i.everyone subscribed will get a copy of the message
> > being
> > passed. If replied, it will end up in the group (someone replying means he
> > wants to join the conversation). This requires everyone maintain their IRC
> > nicks without constant.
> 
> 
> IMO what you guys have done is nice. You may want to fine tune it to be more
> transparent. I think Vasudev did share some links. But whatever be the case,
> when doing such work, which has a tendency to affect multiple users, it would
> be
> much appropriate to first share the plan, get a consensus, and then deploy it.
> 
> 
> 
- -- 
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
"Necessity is the mother of invention."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJX46eVAAoJEKY6WKPy4XVpLn0P/2G+U2fi8EjH31TJUYpT8Vnk
Xlp9L5X6Arr6pqsI/kamu8YGtOBm8hdjGW7q4l7D4BFFRl/yGuactClAhsFcUidH
YV4gK5FIX1VCgAvIr5jNsOBfHQC0YNBDMdx/PvirklYmMSwrKbcz22AirviH3Rev
VtsjRf8G58RkF6WzJkyc6SvvVwpPetXZberR6/z5yQiDdQcBBK4XiFStvwpCaP83
J6KW8fk7XYBNa6z66g0qWc1tm/fbWWChOlCkpfz/X+nE7b2xOYtAeMXMGgOSdF2r
7MB6vS9sRq0R705Ets2jl0TF5FPciPUf2bYiq/tTkNGGh1mlN+j9n9xLi18P0rCw
JSRhExCmUYNwsBIzZAylhRZD7m80UHy1N8qKs+ai1qqcxRIWA1e1UZZQANbW1PYv
OLDAzS77hCVoGeALwyzy+zdENYpGzXMNe0hwtHX9FBMqfnigmGuNlK6h4VZ1GMez
qirRrMskXyc2YcGy0cVnnIlIbVT9tTB3+dq1ocsK8shZc7SdyNKYfoYyJGRoLDb6
oJivuXiHvJwiyFeOTAqbAck2qHUWrC4hb4mtcOgnYs8vjW9DoB/3nRXkoxOaJ+YJ
lxS831AJDQUSswBCroOo4aFTgY6IzdcbGzUYDRRyIQOc7NIVUjfuPXF3lQqHdnRv
JPJboa8bAQy3cqvh0lqC
=aZBY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: