[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFH: drush package in Debian



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi Balasankar and Aneesh,

I never heard back from any of you?
I am hoping you are still interested in maintaining it.


Ritesh


On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 13:18 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 23:12 +0530, Balasankar C wrote:
> > > The current state in Debian is that drush has been removed lacking a
> > maintainer.
> > > It is written in PHP, so if anyone who is well versed with PHP, and has an
> > > interest in Drush/Drupal, may want to adopt this package ?
> > >  
> > 
> > Anish (CC'd) told me he is interested in maintaining (or co-maintaining) the
> > package. He uses Drupal in his work and is good with PHP. And, I believe he
> > uses Drush frequently. Though, he may need some help in getting started with
> > package maintenance (He has contributed to Diaspora packaging in the past).
> 
> This is great. You may want to start with by looking at the initial bug report
> about orphaning the package [1]. It should have more pointers on where further
> to look at, and some of the challenges the previous maintainer had.
> 
> 
> I can help sponsor the package. And since I too use Drupal/Drush, I'll be able
> to help test. Besides that, my understanding of PHP/Drupal/Drush is limited.
> But
> anything of the Debian Packaging and Policy, I should be able to help. 
> 
> You may want to check the Debian PHP Packaging Guidelines to ensure it meets
> policy[2]. And the packaging repo is accessible here [3]
> 
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=798500
> [2] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianPHPGroup
> [3] http://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/drush.git
- -- 
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=FCxD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: