Re: Confused about libnuma1 naming
"J.J. Martzki" <mars14850@gmail.com> writes:
> Package 'libnuma1' is built from numactl, and there seems no 'libnuma'
> exists. Why does it named as 'libnuma1' rather than 'libnuma'?
Shared library packages should be named after the library SONAME, which
generally includes a version (as it does here). See:
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html#run-time-shared-libraries
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: