Re: Bug#1007717: Updated draft resolution

[Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>]

Hello,

On Thu 16 Jun 2022 at 08:47am +02, Helmut Grohne wrote:

>
> Indeed, and I do agree that 4c is such a clear statement. I would like
> to see a stronger statement here, but Sam et al. tried to gain consensus
> on that and there wasn't. So the CTTE advice probably shouldn't override
> that non-consensus. That makes 4c a lot more of an attractive option to
> me. Finally, the main conflicting parties in this issue (oversimplified)
> were Lucas and Ian, so if 4c is strong enough for Lucas, that's good as
> well.
>
> I hereby withdraw my intention to extend the ballot as sent by Sean on
> June 7th.
>
> Thanks for bearing with me and bringing those arguments forward.

Cool, thanks for reviewing and confirming that.

-- 
Sean Whitton