Accepted dpkg 1.18.18 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 13:53:12 +0100
Source: dpkg
Binary: dpkg libdpkg-dev dpkg-dev libdpkg-perl dselect
Architecture: source
Version: 1.18.18
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Dpkg Developers <debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>
Description:
dpkg - Debian package management system
dpkg-dev - Debian package development tools
dselect - Debian package management front-end
libdpkg-dev - Debian package management static library
libdpkg-perl - Dpkg perl modules
Changes:
dpkg (1.18.18) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Guillem Jover ]
* Documentation:
- Document DPKG_DATADIR in an ENVIRONMENT section in dpkg-architecture(1).
- Add a rationale for the purpose of Testsuite-Triggers in dsc(5).
Prompted by Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org>.
* Packaging:
- Revert the perl to perl:any dependency change in libdpkg-perl, as that
breaks debootstrap in stable (jessie), testing (stretch) and unstable,
which do not support arch-qualified dependencies. We'll have to live
with the Multi-Arch hinter being unhappy for now.
.
[ Updated man pages translations ]
* German (Helge Kreutzmann).
Checksums-Sha1:
850f97affd6bced7764605a8c367d10dfad48094 2032 dpkg_1.18.18.dsc
bfa739a8ada3a2d6410ee340129e952bdaca1443 4501988 dpkg_1.18.18.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
9c1d708ce829901d5eb012e976aace86554d01bb0643edd1b7a05c261e42d60c 2032 dpkg_1.18.18.dsc
c88b61e3d4660500753142689e8ddbeff1c731f29549f3338e6975f655936ff5 4501988 dpkg_1.18.18.tar.xz
Files:
9b78ca3ab3fac97de7c2b28b3d0c1f17 2032 admin required dpkg_1.18.18.dsc
f68cee943aa275a326c0d7e263ee4242 4501988 admin required dpkg_1.18.18.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=QJQ2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: