Re: Bug#504880: Disambiguate "installed" for packages
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Steve Langasek <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> I might also add at the end:
>> In such situations, the depended-on package should perform an equivalent
>> clean-up operation if it's the first package to be removed or purged.
>> But that may not be unambiguous enough to add any value here and I can't
>> be bothered to further tune the language right now; I don't think that's
>> a blocker and this bug has run quite long enough already.
> I'm going to bail on that because of the length of the bug
Reasonable. When making a suggestion for a new normative requirement
like that, I probably should have just filed a new (low-severity)
> Does that look okay?
Yes, that is much clearer.
Thanks again, and sorry to nitpick so.