[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#582423: tech-ctte: reaffirm that violating Debian Policy deserves RC bug



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ian Jackson wrote:
>       Conflicts+Replaces should be used only to ensure that obsolete
>       packages are removed in favour of new packages.  A package
>       should not declare Replaces against any non-obsolete package,
>       and it should not declare Replaces against any virtual package
>       it itself provides.

I don't see a point here. Conflicts already ensures that conflicting packages
cannot stay in the system.

- --
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkv2neIACgkQchorMMFUmYw30QCgyYNcKdH1Mrcw1lQ7PiHNenAU
6BYAoKKWOJbwwO9cJRhOD9nky7YG4zSV
=OBeD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: