Quoting Steve Langasek (vorlon@debian.org): > Do I understand from the headers that this thread originated on the dpkg > list? This is not a dpkg issue, the samba package uses ucf, not conffiles. Yes, your understanding is correct. I did expand the To: list because I was pretty sure this was related to samba and its use of ucf. I was just missing the big about the timestamp being altered when a conffile is handled by ucf but that's logical: *you*'re the one who added ucf to samba, Steve, not me...:-) Your answer makes sense to me so I don't really see a bug there, which is what I wanted to confirme.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature