Re: dpkg flex-based status file parser, for 35% speedup
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: dpkg flex-based status file parser, for 35% speedup
- From: Mark Brown <email@example.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 01:01:09 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20070901000050.GF14980@sirena.org.uk>
- Mail-followup-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- In-reply-to: <email@example.com>
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20070831033051.GB24574@zulo.hadrons.org> <email@example.com>
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 02:54:51PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Guillem Jover writes ("Re: dpkg flex-based status file parser, for 35% speedup"):
> > At the same time this rises the question of the static linking
> > against zlib, libbz2 and libselinux, I've switched those to dynamic
> Why are we not using external programs for this ? Does anyone know ?
I was told by Scott at one point that it was done that way for robustness.
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
Description: Digital signature