Re: dpkg flex-based status file parser, for 35% speedup
- To: debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: dpkg flex-based status file parser, for 35% speedup
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>
- Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 01:01:09 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20070901000050.GF14980@sirena.org.uk>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <18136.7595.436173.214640@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk>
- References: <18130.58341.210815.470424@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk> <87myw9bfwn.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> <18134.42338.94935.797373@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk> <20070831033051.GB24574@zulo.hadrons.org> <18136.7595.436173.214640@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk>
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 02:54:51PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Guillem Jover writes ("Re: dpkg flex-based status file parser, for 35% speedup"):
> > At the same time this rises the question of the static linking
> > against zlib, libbz2 and libselinux, I've switched those to dynamic
> Why are we not using external programs for this ? Does anyone know ?
I was told by Scott at one point that it was done that way for robustness.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to: