Re: is dpkg new architecture specifications going to be fixed and documented?

To: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>, Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>, debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org, 363193@bugs.debian.org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: is dpkg new architecture specifications going to be fixed and documented?
From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 09:18:34 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 87u06w5wkl.dancerj%dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060607071200.GA29325@zulo.hadrons.org>
References: <[🔎] 874pyxdgh7.dancerj%dancer@netfort.gr.jp> <[🔎] 20060607071200.GA29325@zulo.hadrons.org>

Hi,


> You'll have to depend on a new enough version of dpkg (1.13.17) or
> conditionally use the feature if that dpkg version is present.

This information belongs to BACKWARD COMPATIBILITY section of the
manpage.

regards,
	junichi
-- 
dancer@{debian.org,netfort.gr.jp}   Debian Project

Reply to:

References:
- is dpkg new architecture specifications going to be fixed and documented?
  - From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
- Re: is dpkg new architecture specifications going to be fixed and documented?
  - From: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: is dpkg new architecture specifications going to be fixed and documented?
Next by Date: Deb Diffs : Is this the right time for binary diffs?
Previous by thread: Re: is dpkg new architecture specifications going to be fixed and documented?
Next by thread: PATCH: Make install-info use fcntl (via perl's flock) for locking
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread