On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 21:20 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > While working on my dpkg-dev bug squashing I noticed that dpkg's debian > control has some very old stuff in it that is probably not needed > anymore, like conflicts that are against potato packages or versioned > dependencies that are automatically satisfied in woody and later. > > I propose to clean up this stuff a bit to reduce the amount of cruft > that gets assembled over the years. > I don't see any reason to drop support for upgrades from potato ... in fact, I don't see any reason to drop support for upgrades from *any* version of dpkg... They don't cost much to keep. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Description: This is a digitally signed message part