tags 957 - patch thanks On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 18:53 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: >This functionnality would be really, really, really useful. This bug is >open since 1995, and in June 2004 someone gave a patch to implement the >requested functionnality. Is it possible to include this patch ? > This was already discussed recently, I've stated that the implementation in this patch is not ideal and that post-sarge I will provide a log file containing details of all the states that dpkg puts packages through. >If necessary, I can implement the functionnality in recent versions of >dpkg. If you want me to do so, please give me the address of the >CVS/Subversion repository in which dpkg development occurs. > http://www.dpkg.org/ArchRepository Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part