Re: Processed: Re: Change initscripts rather than dpkg?

To: debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Processed: Re: Change initscripts rather than dpkg?
From: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:07:57 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050209170757.GE19622@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] handler.s.C.110793882620651.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
References: <1107938784.4128.222.camel@thanatos> <[🔎] handler.s.C.110793882620651.transcript@bugs.debian.org>

Quoting Debian Bug Tracking System (owner@bugs.debian.org):
> Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> 
> > retitle 254998 "[DPKG] remove space before ellipsis to match initscript style"
> Bug#254998: [DPKG] place space before ellipsis to match initscript style
> Changed Bug title.


We might consider fixing this in sarge.....But of course it will fuzzy
translations..:-)

So either this is fixed and I have to jump on all PO files and hack
them down (assuming translators were consistent with the use of
ellipsis in thei languages

Or this waits for post-sarge...

Reply to:

References:
- Processed: Re: Change initscripts rather than dpkg?
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#274366: marked as done (dpkg: dutch translation gives confusing options
Next by Date: Processing of dpkg_1.10.27_i386.changes
Previous by thread: Processed: Re: Change initscripts rather than dpkg?
Next by thread: Processing of dpkg_1.10.27_i386.changes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread