On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 14:58 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > > Debian GNU/Hurd is not a released architecture. > > Yes, but as GNU/Hurd lives only in unstable, this is actually broken > for all currently available distributions of hurd-i386 in the archive. > True, but it isn't an "important" bug -- it's of normal severity imo. Raising severities of bugs without actually asking the maintainer what they think the severity should be is just irritating. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part