Re: binary NMUs and version numbers
* GOTO Masanori (email@example.com) [041125 15:30]:
> I think this suffix epoch works as the current (prefix) epoch, is it
> correct? (Thus, we shouldn't recognize "1.2-3^1.1" and "1.2-3^1a").
Technically: Yes. But I would like to keep usage as lightweight as
possible (and, not allow the suffix epoch for source versions of course,
but _only_ for binary ones).
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C