[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: dpkg postinst.d patch: progress ping

On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 21:30 +1000, Russell Coker wrote:

> On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 18:28, Scott James Remnant <scott@netsplit.com> wrote:
> > There's been some useful discussion in the past about good ways to
> > schedule commands to be run after dpkg has completed its run, but it's
> > way off the radar at the moment.  Feature requests like this are post-
> > sarge at least!
> Sure it's post-sarge, but we still have to work on it now if we want to get it 
> in the next release.  I expect that last-minute changes to dpkg aren't 
> desired...
You misunderstand ... it's dpkg post-sarge, therefore sarge+2 for
stable/unstable bridge support.

Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: