On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 21:30 +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 18:28, Scott James Remnant <email@example.com> wrote: > > There's been some useful discussion in the past about good ways to > > schedule commands to be run after dpkg has completed its run, but it's > > way off the radar at the moment. Feature requests like this are post- > > sarge at least! > > Sure it's post-sarge, but we still have to work on it now if we want to get it > in the next release. I expect that last-minute changes to dpkg aren't > desired... > You misunderstand ... it's dpkg post-sarge, therefore sarge+2 for stable/unstable bridge support. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Description: This is a digitally signed message part