[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#170812: marked as done (dselect is gone !!)

Your message dated Thu, 06 May 2004 21:43:16 +0100
with message-id <1083876196.2803.12.camel@localhost>
and subject line Bug#170812: dselect is gone !!
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2002 16:10:33 +0000
>From tp@alternativ.net Tue Nov 26 10:10:32 2002
Return-path: <tp@alternativ.net>
Received: from mailout02.sul.t-online.com [] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18GiIB-0002pX-00; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:10:31 -0600
Received: from fwd01.sul.t-online.de 
	by mailout02.sul.t-online.com with smtp 
	id 18GiI9-0001Uo-0E; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 17:10:29 +0100
Received: from guru (520042928498-0001@[]) by fmrl01.sul.t-online.com
	with esmtp id 18GiHu-214E8eC; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 17:10:14 +0100
Received: from vinci by guru with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18GiHs-0006O5-00; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 17:10:12 +0100
From: Thilo Pfennig <tp@alternativ.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: dselect is gone !!
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 17:10:01 +0100
Message-Id: <E18GiHs-0006O5-00@guru>
Sender: Thilo Pfennig <tp@alternativ.net>
X-Sender: 520042928498-0001@t-dialin.net
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0

Package: dselect
Version: 1.10.4
Severity: normal

Woody suggests to deinstall "old" dselect. If you do, you loose it.
As many users use dselect, they will not be able to install dselect and
other software again!


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux guru 2.4.18-k6 #1 Sun Apr 14 12:43:22 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro

Versions of packages dselect depends on:
ii  libc6                    2.2.5-14        GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libncurses5              5.2.20020112a-7 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2   1:2.95.4-7      The GNU stdc++ library

Received: (at 170812-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 May 2004 20:43:18 +0000
>From scott@netsplit.com Thu May 06 13:43:18 2004
Return-path: <scott@netsplit.com>
Received: from populous.netsplit.com (mailgate.netsplit.com) [] (qmailr)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BLpiA-0004XD-00; Thu, 06 May 2004 13:43:18 -0700
Received: (qmail 5055 invoked from network); 6 May 2004 20:43:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO syndicate.netsplit.com) (scott@
  by populous.netsplit.com with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; 6 May 2004 20:43:16 -0000
Subject: Re: Bug#170812: dselect is gone !!
From: Scott James Remnant <scott@netsplit.com>
To: 170812-done@bugs.debian.org
In-Reply-To: <20040222120745.GA31134@riva.ucam.org>
References: <E18GiHs-0006O5-00@guru>  <20040222120745.GA31134@riva.ucam.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-5s9keH0cp6Kjp33VyLmA"
Message-Id: <1083876196.2803.12.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.5.7 
Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 21:43:16 +0100
Delivered-To: 170812-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 12:07 +0000, Colin Watson wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 05:10:01PM +0100, Thilo Pfennig wrote:
> > Package: dselect
> > Version: 1.10.4
> > Severity: normal
> >=20
> > Woody suggests to deinstall "old" dselect. If you do, you loose it.
> > As many users use dselect, they will not be able to install dselect and
> > other software again!
> Is this still the case? dpkg Pre-Depends on dselect.
> Also, could you clarify exactly what versions you're talking about? You
> mention woody, but dselect was not a separate package in woody. Are you
> talking about an upgrade from woody to sarge? If you're talking about a
> downgrade from sarge to woody, then this is not a bug, as dselect was
> part of the dpkg package in woody.
No reply, looks reasonable to close.

Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)



Reply to: