[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#78015: marked as done ([ASSERT] lib/dump.c:180: w_dependency: Assertion `yp->up == pigp' failed.)



Your message dated Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:35:52 +1100
with message-id <20031112063552.GD29659@trinity.unimelb.edu.au>
and subject line aiee, I sense this is not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2000 06:22:32 +0000
>From daniel@kabuki.eyep.net Sun Nov 26 00:22:32 2000
Return-path: <daniel@kabuki.eyep.net>
Received: from (kabuki.eyep.net) [203.36.158.121] (qmailr)
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 13zvCg-0001g4-00; Sun, 26 Nov 2000 00:22:31 -0600
Received: (qmail 31541 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2000 06:24:39 -0000
Received: from localhost (HELO kabuki.eyep.net) (DanielS@127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 26 Nov 2000 06:24:39 -0000
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: various dpkg breakages
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 17:24:31 +1100
From: Daniel Stone <daniel@kabuki.eyep.net>
Message-Id: <E13zvCg-0001g4-00@master.debian.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: dpkg
Version: 1.7.2-1

I'm using the dpkg from woody, and I've just done an apt-get update; apt-get
dist-upgrade, and dpkg is doing some _VERY_ weird shit. I first got a bug
installing glibc that I unfortunately can't report as I had it in my gpm
buffer, but I forgot about it and rebooted, and when I just re-ran apt-get
dist-upgrade, it worked, it was something about an internal error, was
really weird. IIRC it was from dump.c, line 160.
Here's one I _CAN_ log:
Preparing to replace calife 2.8.4-2 (using .../calife_2.8.4b-1_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement calife ...
dpkg: /home/wichert/sources/cvs/debian/x/dpkg-1.7.2/lib/dump.c:180: w_dependency: Assertion `yp->up == pigp' failed.
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg exited unexpectedly

This happens every time.


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 79807-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Nov 2003 06:35:56 +0000
>From dstone@trinity.unimelb.edu.au Wed Nov 12 00:35:55 2003
Return-path: <dstone@trinity.unimelb.edu.au>
Received: from epistula.trinity.unimelb.edu.au [203.28.240.16] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AJobb-0003Fa-00; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 00:35:55 -0600
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by epistula.trinity.unimelb.edu.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 126F2B3
	for <79807-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:35:51 +1100 (EST)
Received: from epistula.trinity.unimelb.edu.au ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (epistula [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
 id 03687-02-10 for <79807-done@bugs.debian.org>;
 Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:35:50 +1100 (EST)
Received: from roger.trinity.unimelb.edu.au (roger.trinity.unimelb.edu.au [203.28.240.3])
	by epistula.trinity.unimelb.edu.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id DABC2A5
	for <79807-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:35:50 +1100 (EST)
Received: by roger.trinity.unimelb.edu.au (Postfix, from userid 1280)
	id 0C08117E3C; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:35:53 +1100 (EST)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:35:52 +1100
From: Daniel Stone <daniels@debian.org>
To: 79807-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: aiee, I sense this is not a bug
Message-ID: <20031112063552.GD29659@trinity.unimelb.edu.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1sNVjLsmu1MXqwQ/"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-GnuPG-Key: 3CED7EFD
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p3 (Debian) at trinity.unimelb.edu.au
Delivered-To: 79807-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0
	tests=none
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)


--1sNVjLsmu1MXqwQ/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Looking back at the bug log for #79807, I doubt xfonts-base was making
my / ro, somehow.

--=20
Daniel Stone                                                <daniels@debian=
.org>
Debian X Strike Force:                    http://people.debian.org/~branden=
/xsf/

--1sNVjLsmu1MXqwQ/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/sdTIcPClnTztfv0RAv8uAKCO/25vlH0tS6OZoL8kk4OKeaMg6QCfUVu3
h51Z+SPowWXwgRWQYoHH5wg=
=/SGT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--1sNVjLsmu1MXqwQ/--



Reply to: