Bug#197800: marked as done ([ASSERT] lib/dump.c:214: w_dependency: Assertion `dyp->up == pigp' failed upgrading db3-doc)
Your message dated Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:35:52 +1100
with message-id <20031112063552.GD29659@trinity.unimelb.edu.au>
and subject line aiee, I sense this is not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jun 2003 18:23:18 +0000
>From lazarus@overdue.ddts.net Tue Jun 17 13:23:18 2003
Return-path: <lazarus@overdue.ddts.net>
Received: from 208-186-55-240.nrp3feld.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (phoenix.overdue.ddts.net) [208.186.55.240]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19SL6z-0000Jm-00; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 13:23:18 -0500
Received: by phoenix.overdue.ddts.net (Postfix, from userid 1002)
id 7B19273043; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 18:21:52 +0000 (UTC)
From: Lazarus Long <lazarus@overdue.ddts.net>
Subject: db3-doc: upgrade errors stop dpkg cold
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2
Message-Id: <20030617182152.7B19273043@phoenix.overdue.ddts.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 18:21:52 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_17 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: db3-doc
Version: N/A
Severity: critical
Preparing to replace db3-doc 3.2.9-18 (using .../db3-doc_3.2.9-19_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement db3-doc ...
Adding Swap: 4088k swap-space (priority -15)
dpkg: /mount/md0/home/adam/debian/mine/dpkg/v1_10/dpkg-1.10.10/lib/dump.c:214: w_dependency: Assertion `dyp->up == pigp' failed.
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg exited unexpectedly
Who is adam and why is this happening?
-- System Information
Debian Release: post-3.0(+)
Kernel Version: Linux box 2.4.21 #1 Fri Jun 13 21:18:43 UTC 2003 i486 GNU/Linux
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 79807-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Nov 2003 06:35:56 +0000
>From dstone@trinity.unimelb.edu.au Wed Nov 12 00:35:55 2003
Return-path: <dstone@trinity.unimelb.edu.au>
Received: from epistula.trinity.unimelb.edu.au [203.28.240.16]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AJobb-0003Fa-00; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 00:35:55 -0600
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by epistula.trinity.unimelb.edu.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 126F2B3
for <79807-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:35:51 +1100 (EST)
Received: from epistula.trinity.unimelb.edu.au ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (epistula [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
id 03687-02-10 for <79807-done@bugs.debian.org>;
Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:35:50 +1100 (EST)
Received: from roger.trinity.unimelb.edu.au (roger.trinity.unimelb.edu.au [203.28.240.3])
by epistula.trinity.unimelb.edu.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id DABC2A5
for <79807-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:35:50 +1100 (EST)
Received: by roger.trinity.unimelb.edu.au (Postfix, from userid 1280)
id 0C08117E3C; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:35:53 +1100 (EST)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:35:52 +1100
From: Daniel Stone <daniels@debian.org>
To: 79807-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: aiee, I sense this is not a bug
Message-ID: <20031112063552.GD29659@trinity.unimelb.edu.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1sNVjLsmu1MXqwQ/"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-GnuPG-Key: 3CED7EFD
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p3 (Debian) at trinity.unimelb.edu.au
Delivered-To: 79807-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0
tests=none
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--1sNVjLsmu1MXqwQ/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Looking back at the bug log for #79807, I doubt xfonts-base was making
my / ro, somehow.
--=20
Daniel Stone <daniels@debian=
.org>
Debian X Strike Force: http://people.debian.org/~branden=
/xsf/
--1sNVjLsmu1MXqwQ/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/sdTIcPClnTztfv0RAv8uAKCO/25vlH0tS6OZoL8kk4OKeaMg6QCfUVu3
h51Z+SPowWXwgRWQYoHH5wg=
=/SGT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--1sNVjLsmu1MXqwQ/--
Reply to: