[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#185054: marked as done (dpkg: /usr/bin/md5sum < whatever_file --> '[md5sum string] -')



Your message dated 06 Jul 2003 18:14:08 +0200
with message-id <1057508047.2688.1172.camel@thanatos>
and subject line To fix #185054, please update your packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2003 20:26:58 +0000
>From pp@ieee.org Sun Mar 16 14:26:58 2003
Return-path: <pp@ieee.org>
Received: from vsmtp2.tin.it (smtp2.cp.tin.it) [212.216.176.222] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18ueif-0008IG-00; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 14:26:57 -0600
Received: from localhost (212.171.18.32) by smtp2.cp.tin.it (6.5.033)
        id 3E6608750047776D for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 21:26:33 +0100
Received: from pp by localhost with local (masqmail 0.2.11) id
 18uVCH-1I2-00; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 11:16:53 +0100
From: <pp@ieee.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: dpkg: /usr/bin/md5sum < whatever_file  --> '[md5sum string]  -'
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 11:16:53 +0100
Message-ID: <18uVCH-1I2-00@localhost>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=4.0
	tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,HAS_PACKAGE,NO_REAL_NAME,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: *

Package: dpkg
Version: 1.10.9
Severity: important



-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux svp 2.4.21-pre5 #1 Tue Mar 4 02:56:34 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages dpkg depends on:
ii  dselect                       1.10.9     a user tool to manage Debian packa
ii  libc6                         2.2.5-14.3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

The md5sum utility outputs '  -' as msd5sum from textutils, whereas 
the same util from prev. dpkg (e.g. 1.9.21) outputs just the clean 
md5sum string; the result is that dpkg-scanpackages fails.

--
Paolo



---------------------------------------
Received: (at 185054-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jul 2003 16:16:04 +0000
>From jdthood@yahoo.co.uk Sun Jul 06 11:14:10 2003
Return-path: <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk>
Received: from mars.mj.nl [81.91.1.49] 
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19ZC9S-00014t-00; Sun, 06 Jul 2003 11:14:10 -0500
Received: (qmail 30555 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2003 16:14:09 -0000
Received: from 81-91-5-95-customer.mjdsl.nl (HELO thanatos.localdomain) (81.91.5.95)
  by www.mj.nl with SMTP; 6 Jul 2003 16:14:09 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by thanatos.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id B18AF10D62E
	for <185054-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun,  6 Jul 2003 18:14:08 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: To fix #185054, please update your packages
From: Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk>
To: 185054-done@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1057508047.2688.1172.camel@thanatos>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.0 
Date: 06 Jul 2003 18:14:08 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: 185054-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_01,USER_AGENT_XIMIAN
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

md5sum and md5sum.textutils have the same output format.
This is intentional.  dpkg-scanpackages does not fail on
my system.  I suggest you update your dpkg-dev package.
If this does not fix your problem, please reopen this report
and provide a lot more details.

--
Thomas Hood




Reply to: