Bug#47267: Bug #47267 in pam-apps?
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 02:19:55PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> Re: #47267
>
> I have a strong suspicion that the fault here lies with the
> pam-apps package -- specifically, with its prerm or postrm.
> Unfortunately, as pam-apps is obsolete and I can't find a copy
> of the package anywhere, I can't confirm my suspicion.
>
> The hypothesis is that the pam-apps postrm deleted /etc/pam.d/su
> on remove or purge. Other packages' postrms have been caught
> doing the same (wrong) thing.
You're suspicion is incorrect.
Most likely the case is that if pam-apps removed (not purged) and a
newer login was installed that replaced /etc/pam.d/su, then latter
pam-apps was "purged", removing the config files.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/
Reply to: