Bug#33394: not a bug?
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 10:51:48AM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> Housekeeping ...
>
> > Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 00:41:59 +0000 (GMT)
> >
> > dpkg --forget-old-unavail only removes unavailable packages
> > from the status file which have Status: purge ok not-installed,
> > but not those which have Status: hold ok not-installed,
>
> This doesn't look like a bug to me. Close?
If I recall correctly, the default status for a new package used to be
"hold ok not-installed", whereas it is currently "purge ok
not-installed". So it may still be worth keeping this around for a
bit.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London
website: http://www.maths.qmul.ac.uk/~jdg/
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see: http://people.debian.org/~jdg/
Visit http://www.thehungersite.com/ to help feed the hungry
Reply to: