Re: Current "dpkg on Hurd" issues
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> * Depends on sysvinit (>= 2.72), which is not available on the Hurd.
> A provides in some Hurd package is not good enough because dpkg can't
> cope with versioned dependencies on provided packages last time I checked.
What's wrong with having an empty sysvinit? I'm certain other packages would
have this same issue, not just dpkg.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org