Bug#139838: dpkg: performance problem - package database hash size too small
Previously Colin Watson wrote:
> Investigation shows that the hash used to store available packages
> (lib/database.c) has 128 bins, and was last tuned with a sample set of
> 141 packages in total. Since there are now over 9000 binary packages in
> unstable, this could do with being tuned again.
Funny, Jason Gunthorpe said he made the exact same benchmark a while
ago and claimed it did not improve things at all. Looks like we do
have to look into the hashing.
/email@example.com This space intentionally left occupied \
| firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org