Bug#136110: md5sum binary should be from textutils, not dpkg

To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, 136110@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#136110: md5sum binary should be from textutils, not dpkg
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 10:49:31 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020301094931.GY32152@wiggy.net>
Reply-to: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>, 136110@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] E16gir1-0000IP-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1020228183916.2671A-100000@wakko.debian.net> <[🔎] E16gir1-0000IP-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>

Previously Herbert Xu wrote:
> I can't reproduce this behaviour:

Jason was running on mips, it might be architecture-specific.

Wichert.

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________
 /wichert@wiggy.net         This space intentionally left occupied \
| wichert@deephackmode.org            http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug#136110: md5sum binary should be from textutils, not dpkg
  - From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@debian.org>

References:
- Bug#136110: md5sum binary should be from textutils, not dpkg
  - From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>

Prev by Date: Bug#136110: md5sum binary should be from textutils, not dpkg
Next by Date: Re: Bug#136110: md5sum binary should be from textutils, not dpkg
Previous by thread: Bug#136110: md5sum binary should be from textutils, not dpkg
Next by thread: Re: Bug#136110: md5sum binary should be from textutils, not dpkg
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread