Re: dpkg was interrupted, you must MANUALLY *what*...????
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Er no. Most likely dpkg took a segfault so it couldn't clean up it's
> > journal.
> Funny, I haven't seen or heard of a dpkg segfault in quite some time
> now. I actually see more bugreports about apt crapping out on corrupt
> files :)
Well, Mr. Paul seems to have hit a bug, and he isn't the only one to have
seen that message.
> You should still implement support for the status pipe in apt, it
> can improve things nicely.
I've already explained that it isn't sufficient, it needs to be two way so
commands can be sent 1 at a time to be executed.
Jason
Reply to: