Re: RFD: translated description with dpkg
Previously Steve Greenland wrote:
> I also think the standalone .deb argument is pretty bogus.
I disagree. A standalone .deb should never be less useful to people then
one that is in some archive.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| wichert@wiggy.net http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Reply to: