Re: Inconsistent Architecture?
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 09:07:00AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> Subject: Re: Inconsistent Architecture?
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 08:10:02AM -0400, Itai Zukerman wrote:
> > In debian/control, the Architecture field allows either "all", "any",
> > or a list of arches (from 4.2.3 in the Packaging Manual). I'm
> > wondering why the ! notation from build dependencies hasn't also been
> > taken up here. For example:
> > Architecture: !i386 !alpha
> Would be especially useful for things like:
> Architecture: !hurd-i386
YES please - it would make things much easier for the s390 port to
exclude s390, instead of having to include all of todays ports today,
and have to fix it when the next $ARCH comes along tomorrow.
//rhi
--
This letter does not include my 20-line Corporate-Image .signature.
Consider yourself lucky.
Have a nice day ;-) Richard Higson mailto:richard.higson@gt.owl.de
Reply to: